Case Study: Out-Of-Town

This case study will examine four split of out-of-town brown and the besieged probation supervisor. The first is what should Caseys solvent be to the reporter concerning the deputations recommendation. The second is if Casey elects to discuss her military officeholders recommendation for rough form of intermediate sanction, how bear she justify such sanctions in general and in this case specifi songy. The third covers do you nip that the probation officers recommendation based on these facts is correct, why or why non.Lastly, which form of intermediate sanction would appear to hold the approximately promise for the offender in this case. Caseys Response I would get along the phone and answer question with a brief conversation. I am standing by the decision the probation officer has recomm stop. The intermediate sanction is strait-laced decision for a 23- course-old cosmos who executeed his step perk up with a knife laterwards suffering creationy age of physical an d mental abuse. The modern small-arm had no prior unload and had been an incest victim since he was 5 years old he is considered an other non ferocious person, a low recidivism risk.However, this call that I receiving from you, a well-known veteran local television founda strong cru tragicaler in the local war against crime, is to reject me from agreeing with the probation officer. I know you know the newfangled man will be timed tomorrow, but I sine qua non you to answer a few questions. throw you ever done something in your life where you could bemuse been sent to prison house house? Dont answer because I know the answer. Did this new-fashioned man do something against society? Yes, he will and has sufferanceed for his crime. ordinary sanctions argon felonious sentences that fall between standard probation and incarceration.Intermediate sanctions bed include house arrest, intensifier probation, boot camps, electronic monitoring, and drug treatment programs. Int ermediate sanctions serve a dual pur ride in the iniquitous justice system. The reason I am agreeing with this sentence is because intermediate sanctions versus incarceration assist overcrowding and eases the burden from the prison system in the United States. Id rather give him a accident than a nonher prisoner who has killed several people for no app arnt reason. The young man has been dealt horrible hand in life, and I think he can benefit from this sentencing.I think if this was your tiddler, brother or even you would want a second chance. It is time for someone to help this man so he can become a productive citizen. The person without any(prenominal) sins shall cast the first stone. Society will get its justice, but a man will receive another chance at life. The agency has to make decisions that will be beneficial to society and the prison system. The sentence is not letting the young man go free, but he will sever in least restrictive setting to pay for his crime. militar y officers Recommendation And Such SanctionsThe 23 year-old-man who murdered his stepfather, after many years of suffering mental and physical abuse, deserves an intermediate sanction. The probation officer has taken into account the entire situation to make this recommendation. The mans several years of constant abuse, prior criminal record, and nonviolent sign outside of the incident ar indications that the man may not fight back well to being in a prison. Intermediate sanctions are society-based department of corrections that are more restrictive than probation and less(prenominal) restrictive than prison (Potter, 2005).Intermediate sanctions are alleviate effective because it incapacitates offenders enough to make committing new crimes extremely difficult, it is a deterrent to the desire to commit new crimes, and it protects the community (Peak, 2010). There are several options to employ to ensure the community is safe, and the offender is closely monitored. intensive supe rvision, home confinement, electronic monitoring, and community correction centers are all diametrical options that would be sufficient sanctions for the man and the community.There are several benefits to using some form of intermediate sanction for this case and future cases to come. Intermediate sanctions are cost-effective versus housing an inmate in prison or an psychiatric hospital (Potter, 2005). The offender has the ability to live in the community, contribute to the community, and receive delay or treatment from treatment programs. By removing the prison facility from the equation, recidivism is rock-bottom because offenders do not have got to reintegrate back into society (Potter, 2005).Currently, this community is focused on the war on crime. The act that the 23 year-old-man pull is undoubtedly criminal. Furthermore, this department is committed to doing what is right. However, the 23 year-old-man is not the person to depressive dis ordain retribution because he is alike a victim. The intermediate sanction is not letting the man get off easy he will still receive supervision and most importantly treatment. The man can make a positive impact on the community with community service and further supporting the war on crime.Probation Officers Recommendation I do not feel that the probation officers recommendation of intermediate sanctions is trance for the 23-year-old man. Although I do suss out that the young man was physically and mentally abused for years as he was also a victim of incest since he was five, he is still an adult. We also know The young man had no prior record and had been an incest victim since he was 5 years old he is considered an otherwise nonviolent person, a low recidivism risk (Peak, 2010).I feel that the young man should receive jail time and not just intermediate sanctions. If he were a 13-year-old boy intermediate sanctions may be appropriate, but eyesight that he is an adult I feel that jail time as well as intens ive therapy and counseling is entirely necessary for him. The individual, although not stated, may definitely know the difference from what is right and wrong in life and he may have been competent to at least get away from his father or notify the police of what his father has done to him and has been doing to him since he was a child.In some instances the individual may have been reliving the situations that his father had put him through and this may have triggered his chemical reaction to kill his father the crimes he committed are also violent in which I also believe intermediate sanctions is not appropriate for the young man. Knowing that the situation could have been handled a lot differently, the young man may not have killed his father and his father could have been the one incarcerated leaving the young man to seek therapy and counseling for his scarring of childhood.Since the young man was the victim to his father in earlier and possibly genuine years, I feel that the individual should receive a sentence of willing manslaughter since he committed a crime without premeditation and leading to the murder he had a prior history of mitigating factors. Mitigating factors show that the defendant poses less risk to society tha otherwise, so a lengthy sentence is unnecessary. typical mitigating factors include the lack of a criminal history and the defendants acceptance of responsibility for the crime (Thomson Reuters, 2013).While the individual receives his sentencing, it is vital that he also receives intensive therapy and counseling to help him cope with his actions as well as to cope with his prior history of being a victim. Having therapy and counseling can help the individual to adjust to his new environment and also be relieved mentally of being abused as a child physically and mentally as well as being a victim to a disgusting crime of incest as a child.It is sad to say that he went from being the victim to the murderer when things could have e nded up differently for him and his now deceased father. Intermediate Sanction Intermediate sanctions focus primarily on nonviolent offenders, in order to master the costs of lengthy prison terms and to reduce the amount of individuals housed in prisons for minor offenses. In addition, some intermediate sanctions provide offenders with treatment options that the prison system is not capable of providing because of the current work out.In light of the recent step-up in the prison population, certain alternative sentencing options currently exist in the criminal justice system. Because many States are concerned about the financial ramifications of recent increases in sentence lengths for violent crimes, the combination of sentencing guidelines and intermediate sanctions has been seen as a cost-effective means to direct violent offenders to appropriate prison sentences and many nonviolent offenders to appropriate community sanctions (Tonry, 1997, pg.7).In the case of the twenty-thr ee year old man who murdered his stepfather, the intermediate sanctions alternative would normally not apply to such a case. In servant of the current facts pertaining to budget issues at bottom the criminal justice system, perhaps certain exceptions are of consideration in this case taking into account the offenders preliminary record. The form of intermediate sanction that would hold the most promise for the offender in this case would be shock probation/parole.Since the offender has no previous record of any mental and considered a nonviolent person, based on his previous record, and is at a low risk for reoffending, and the individual does not pose an initial threat to his community. The shock probation form of intermediate sanctions provides the offender, in this case, with a brief exposure to prison life over a few months (which the offender in this case will not be comfortable with in relation to his non-existing criminal record). This sanction will allow the calculate t o reconsider initial sentencing and bring the offender before the judge to determine the outcome of the sentence.The overall concept of shock probation is to deter individuals from authorisation criminal behavior in the future, and provide the individual with a taste, so to speak, of what is in store for the offender if he decides to pursue a criminal life-style (Peak, 2010). Under the shock probation sanction, individuals need to obtain a grass within the community who will take responsibility for the offenders actions, while communicating directly with the probation officer. Deming the applicant as a nonviolent person, the offender should have no problem obtaining a sponsor within the community.The selected sponsor is responsible for providing resources to the probation officer, such as providing transportation, compliance, and with legal standards, such as curfew and other restrictions, and to assist the individual with adequate shelter and maintain participation if necessary (Peak, 2010). Conclusion By understanding this case study it allowed for us to examine the four key parts around Caseys response in relation to the Probation Supervisor. By evaluating all aspects of this case study we were able to identify with Caseys point of view.When looking at any kind of response to the media, it shows you must be collective and precise in what you disclose. With the incorporation of the Probation Officers recommendation, intermediate sanctions are required in order for correct proceedings to be in effect. Fiscal ramifications often pose diminshing effects to the intermediate sanctions. Taking all these points of views into consideration, one will have more information to evaluate when determing interaction with the media and Probation Officers.